Curso de geometría métrica, Volume 1. Front Cover. Pedro Puig Adam. Nuevas Graficas, QR code for Curso de geometría métrica. Curso de geometría métrica, Volume 1. Front Cover. Pedro Puig Adam. Patronato de Publicaciones de la Escuela Especial de Ingenieros Industriales, Curso de Geometria metrica. Tomo I-Fundamentos, Tomo II-Complementos. P. Puig Adam. Published by Biblioteca matematica, Price: US$

Author: | Zulkigami Kigakus |

Country: | Mauritius |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Education |

Published (Last): | 24 February 2006 |

Pages: | 403 |

PDF File Size: | 19.27 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 11.77 Mb |

ISBN: | 896-6-21796-763-5 |

Downloads: | 24450 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | JoJolmaran |

I’ve found that doing so leads to clumsy repetition often using the same variables in a slightly different order of the reasoning that lead me to the theorem – because I know gelmetria should work forwards from your assumptions, whereas my reasoning often works backwards from the result to work out how to get there.

## Pedro Puig Adam

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of mstrica website is subject to these policies. I am aware that it is good practice to include formal proofs but if the proof is implied in my explanation leading up to the theorem, is it still necessary to include it formally?

Reasonings, explanations and from time to time, theorems as conclussions.

This has prompted me to start using formal ‘lemma, theorem, proof’ formatting which I’ve never done before. I’m certainly used to writing formal, ‘structured’ mathematics solutions, but in these problems I’ve frequently found I want to split my answers into several lemmas that together lead to a main piig.

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. For this reason I’ve been writing in normal prose, describing my thinking, geomettia arriving every now and then at a main lemma or theorem.

### Pedro Puig Adam biography

Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never geomwtria. Actually, I know a book that is is written in the way you have described. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Mathematics Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled.

### Curso de geometria metrica – Pedro Puig Adam – Google Books

My question is, is it always necessary to then include a formal proof of the theorem after its statement, if I’ve already explained how I got there? Should one always place the proof of a theorem after its statement?

For example, a reader that is just looking for a proof of a gievn theorem, will prefer the Theorem – Proof style. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Some people place it before. It is a Spanish book: Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Nevertheless, I think that this style has asam cons than pros. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. I’m writing up my solutions to a rather large set of number theory problems, and was wondering the following. However, the markers want to see ‘how I arrived at’ my solutions as they are mainly interested in my thought process.